512GB SSD vs. 1TB SSD – How Much Do You Really Need in 2025?

Comments (0)

It’s 2025, and picking the right SSD capacity feels more crucial than ever. You’ve probably narrowed it down to the two most common players: 512GB and 1TB. But which one actually makes sense for you? Well, it's not just about the numbers but also about how you use your tech.

Solid-state drives, or SSDs, are pretty much the standard now – and thank goodness for that, the speed difference from old spinning hard drives is night and day. I remember editing my first YouTube videos on a system with a traditional HDD; the render times were… character-building. Now, with SSDs in everything from PCs to consoles, the bottleneck has shifted. It’s less about speed between drive types and more about having enough of that fast storage.

So, 512GB or 1TB? It’s a common crossroads. In this guide, I’m going to break down how these two stack up. We’ll dive into the current price-per-gigabyte situation (because, as someone who keeps an eye on my finances, value matters), what kind of user you might be – whether you're gaming, buried in student work like I often am, or creating content – and even touch on performance and lifespan.

I'll cover internal drives, those speedy NVMe and older SATA types, plus the portable SSDs I often rely on. And yeah, I’ll definitely be dropping some of my personal favorite drives along the way. By the end, you should have a much clearer picture of which capacity is your Goldilocks zone for 2025.

SSD Storage Trends in 2025: Price and Capacity

Look, the best news here is that SSDs are cheaper than they've ever been. Seriously. The cost per gigabyte has been on a downward slope for years. Right now, in 2025, we're seeing consumer SSDs hover around $0.08 per gigabyte. That's pretty good. It means a 1TB drive – that’s roughly 1000GB – can often be snagged for under $80. Sometimes even for less than $50. Wild.

Now, compare that to 512GB SSDs. You’d think they’d be dramatically cheaper, right? Well, not always. Sometimes they're only a little less – think $30 to $60 for budget options, maybe creeping up to $100 or more for the really premium stuff. The punchline? Often, those larger 1TB drives actually give you more bang for your buck – a lower cost per gigabyte than their 512GB siblings. My inner economist loves that.

Why the affordability on 1TB drives? It’s a mix of manufacturing getting more efficient and good old-fashioned competition. Flash memory prices, the stuff SSDs are made of, apparently took a bit of a rollercoaster in late 2024 and early 2025 – they dipped, spiked briefly, and then by March 2025, SSD prices reportedly settled back down. The outcome for us? More storage for less cash. For instance, there was a budget-friendly NVMe 1TB drive like the Crucial P3 Plus going on sale for a mind-blowing $39. A whole terabyte for under forty bucks! Meanwhile, a high-end 1TB Gen4 like a Samsung 990 Pro might be closer to the $99 mark.

Here’s the main takeaway: in 2025, the price difference between a 512GB and a 1TB SSD is often pretty small. We're talking maybe $20 to $30 to literally double your storage. That's a compelling upgrade. It’s why you’ll hear tech folks, myself included, often nudging people towards 1TB as the new baseline for new systems. If your budget can stretch even a tiny bit, 1TB is usually the smarter play for balancing price and space. But does everyone really need that much? Let's get into specific scenarios.

Is 512GB Enough? Or is 1TB Worth It? – It Depends on Your Usage

Choosing between 512GB and 1TB really boils down to one thing: what are you actually doing with your computer? Let’s walk through some common situations in 2025.

Gaming PCs & Consoles

Okay, gamers, listen up. Modern AAA games are huge. We’re talking 50GB, 100GB, even 150GB per game is not uncommon. Some, after all the updates and DLCs, can even tip over 200GB. I was looking at some 2023 releases; just six of them combined were apparently over 500GB! Titles like Baldur’s Gate 3 or Star Wars Jedi: Survivor? They're often in that 130-150GB ballpark each.

Now, a 512GB SSD can technically hold a few of these monsters. But you'll feel that space crunch fast. After installing the operating system, your essential apps, and maybe 3 to 5 big games, you'll be staring at a "low disk space" warning. This means you’re constantly playing storage Tetris: uninstalling games to make room for new ones, or maybe shuffling them off to a slower external drive if you want to keep them handy. It’s a hassle.

A 1TB SSD, though? That doubles your breathing room. You’re looking at comfortably fitting around 8 to 10 of those big AAA titles, or a healthy mix of blockbusters and a bunch of smaller indie games or older favorites.

And console gamers, you're not immune. The PlayStation 5 comes with an 825GB SSD, but only about 667GB of that is actually usable for your games. I know plenty of PS5 owners who hit that limit pretty quickly. If you’re looking to upgrade your PS5’s storage with an M.2 SSD (Sony says you need at least 250GB for an NVMe, but realistically, you’ll want more), 1TB is a super popular choice. It makes a real difference. The Xbox Series S? That one’s even tighter, older models famously shipping with just a 512GB internal drive (since late 2024 there are 1TB versions available, though), which leaves you with only about 364GB free for games. Ouch. That’s barely enough for a couple of big titles. The Xbox Series X/S do let you use external USB drives for older games or for ‘cold storage’ (archiving games you’re not actively playing), the current-gen titles really demand that fast internal storage or an official expansion card.

In my experience, having only 512GB of storage as a gamer usually means constantly juggling installs – deleting one game just to make room for another. Unless you invest in additional storage, that monthly shuffle becomes the norm.

Simply put, a 1TB SSD lets you spend more time playing and less time managing your library. And believe me, with 4K textures and massive content updates, game sizes aren't shrinking.

Gaming Verdict:

For any serious PC or console gamer, or anyone who likes to have a decent selection of games installed, 1TB is the much safer, more convenient bet in 2025. 512GB can work if you’re a very light gamer, maybe sticking to one or two main esports titles, but it’s just so easy to outgrow. That extra space with 1TB really prevents headaches down the line, especially as new releases get even bigger.

Students and Office Productivity

If your computer life mainly revolves around web Browse, Microsoft Office or Google Workspace, hammering out school assignments, and maybe streaming a movie or two, a 512GB SSD can actually serve you quite well. As a law student, my primary needs are often document-based. Word files, PDFs, research papers – these things are tiny. Even a massive collection of them won’t make a huge dent in 512GB. Productivity suites like Microsoft Office 365? They might take up around 6-10GB to install. That’s it.

Now, if you're like me and end up with tons of lecture recordings or hefty research datasets, things could start adding up. But often, those can be offloaded to an external drive (I have a couple of trusty portable SSDs for this, more on these later) or cloud storage, which many universities provide these days.

One thing to keep an eye on is the operating system itself and what I call "software creep" over time. A clean install of Windows 11 needs about 27GB plus another 3GB or so for default apps, and it will grow with updates and temporary files. Microsoft even recommends a 64GB drive minimum for Windows 11, acknowledging that updates and caches will eat into your space. On a 512GB SSD, after Windows and your typical applications, you might have around 50-100GB used, leaving you a solid 400GB-ish free. For purely academic or office work, that’s often plenty. After a few years of updates, installing more apps, and maybe accumulating large email archives (Outlook PST files can get surprisingly chunky!), you'll see more space used, but it’s generally manageable.

My advice? If you’re a student who also plans to do some serious gaming on the side, or perhaps dive into video editing for a YouTube channel like mine, then definitely lean towards 1TB. But for a laptop that’s strictly for academic work, business tasks, and isn't going to be storing massive media libraries locally, 512GB is usually sufficient. Many ultra-thin laptops in 2025 still come with 512GB in their mid-tier configurations because it hits a good balance of cost and capacity for those everyday tasks.

Productivity Verdict:

For most students and office workers focused on documents, presentations, and light software, 512GB is ample. It can even help keep initial costs down and encourage good habits, like utilizing cloud storage for archiving. However, if you anticipate needing local storage for a lot of videos (maybe you record all your lectures?), large datasets for research, or just want that comfortable buffer for the future, upgrading to 1TB offers great peace of mind. Honestly, with 1TB, you’d have to try really hard to fill it up with just Word documents and spreadsheets!

For those specific cases, though, and a look at machines built for such tasks, I've detailed my choices for the best laptops for engineering students in 2025, where storage capacity is a key part of the discussion.

Content Creators (Video, Photo, Graphics)

Now we're talking my language. If you're a fellow content creator – dealing with video, high-resolution photos, or complex graphic design projects – think of your SSD as your primary "workspace." And for creators, bigger is almost always better. High-resolution files are storage hungry. Period.

If you’re editing video, like I do for my YouTube channel, you know that just one hour of 4K footage can easily consume tens, if not hundreds, of gigabytes, depending on the codec you're using. I’ve had single project folders for a 10-minute video swell to over 100GB with raw footage, proxy files, audio tracks, and graphics. Photographers shooting in RAW format? Each RAW file can be 20-50MB, sometimes more. A few extensive photoshoots can quickly mean hundreds of gigabytes of images to store, catalog, and edit.

In these scenarios, a 512GB SSD will feel cramped. Fast. It’s not just about the final file sizes either. Your editing software creates cache files, preview files, and render files. And, critically, working with an SSD that's nearly full can actually slow down its performance (we’ll touch on that more later). That’s the last thing you want when you’re on a deadline, trying to render out a video or export a batch of photos. Trust me, I've been there with older, smaller drives, and the frustration of your system sputtering because the drive is gasping for air is something I wouldn't wish on anyone.

If you're a video editor, photographer, or graphic designer in 2025, 1TB should be considered the absolute minimum for your local working drive. Even then, you’ll likely need a strategy for offloading completed projects to larger external drives or a NAS (Network Attached Storage) regularly. Many pros I know are already looking at 2TB or even 4TB internal drives as standard. But in the 512GB vs. 1TB debate? The 1TB is a no-brainer; it literally doubles your active workspace. As one savvy commenter on a tech forum put it when discussing video editing rigs: “IMHO, any SSD should be 1TB minimum. They also get slower when full.” Wise words. That relatively small extra cost for a 1TB drive over a 512GB one pales in comparison to the value of a smooth, uninterrupted workflow.

Content Creation Verdict:

Go with 1TB. Or more, if you can. A 512GB SSD might work for very light content creation, or perhaps as a dedicated OS and application drive if you have a robust external storage system for all your project files. But most active creators will hit its limits frustratingly quickly. The combination of project files, software caches, high-res previews, and final exports means that 1TB provides a significantly smoother and less stressful experience for editing 4K videos or managing extensive photo libraries. You can always add more external storage for archiving, but your main work drive shouldn’t be a constant source of anxiety.

General Use & Mixed Work

So, what if you don't fit neatly into one of those boxes? Maybe you’re like me on some days – a bit of everything. Some light gaming, a bit of photo editing for the blog, lots of web Browse, storing personal photos and videos, and perhaps a growing music library (though, as a pianist, my sheet music and MIDI files are pretty small, it's the sample libraries for music production that can be huge!).

For these mixed-use cases, take a moment to think about your biggest storage culprits.

• Do you have an extensive local media library – hundreds of gigabytes of family photos, home videos, or a meticulously curated music collection – that you prefer to keep directly on your computer? If so, 1TB is the safer choice to hold all of that comfortably alongside your OS and applications.

• Or, are you someone who primarily streams your media (Netflix, Spotify, YouTube Music), uses cloud backups for photos (like Google Photos or iCloud), and your largest local files are just a few games or the occasional video project you’re tinkering with? In that case, 512GB might just be enough.

One trend I always factor in, and something my pragmatic side appreciates, is that software and games generally only get larger each year. It's often called "software bloat," but it's also due to richer features and higher-resolution assets. AAA game sizes have roughly doubled compared to where they were 5-6 years ago. Who knows what 2026 or 2027 titles will demand? Your operating system and everyday applications will also consume more space over time with updates, new features, and cached data. So, opting for a larger SSD now can be a subtle way to future-proof your system a bit. It’s an investment in not having to upgrade or constantly delete things in a year or two.

In 2025, 1TB has really become the popular sweet spot for many power users and enthusiasts precisely because it offers that valuable safety margin and flexibility. However, if your usage is genuinely moderate, you’ve looked at your current storage and you're comfortably under, say, 300GB total, and you don’t foresee a massive shift in your habits, a 512GB SSD will still get the job done for general computing. Just make it a habit to keep an eye on your free space.

General Use Verdict:

If your budget isn't super tight, I’d generally nudge you towards 1TB for mixed usage. It just provides more breathing room and flexibility as your needs inevitably evolve. But if you’ve done an honest assessment of your storage habits and they are truly modest (for example, you're currently using less than 300GB of storage across everything), a 512GB SSD will still be a capable performer in 2025. Just be prepared to monitor your free space a bit more actively over time.

Performance Differences: Does a 1TB SSD Really Outperform a 512GB?

Okay, so we’ve talked about fitting your digital life onto these drives. But does going for a 1TB SSD actually get you more than just extra space? Does it unlock some hidden speed boost compared to its 512GB sibling? The answer is... sometimes. Yeah, a bit. Let's break down the tech without getting too lost in the weeds.

Aside from just holding more stuff, there are a few under-the-hood reasons why a larger capacity SSD of the same model line might have a slight edge in performance and longevity.

• Parallelism & Speed

  I like to think of an SSD as a super-fast highway with multiple lanes. Each memory chip (NAND flash chip, or die) is like a lane. To get data on or off quickly, the SSD's controller (the traffic manager) tries to use as many lanes as possible simultaneously. Generally, a 1TB SSD will have more of these NAND chips packed in there than a 512GB version of the exact same drive. More chips can mean the controller can read and write to more of them at once, which can boost overall throughput – that’s your raw speed.

  You see this pop up in real-world examples. Apple's MacBooks, for instance, have sometimes shown noticeable speed differences, with reports of a 1TB model hitting significantly higher read speeds (like ~6.5 GB/s) compared to a 512GB version (~4 GB/s) simply because the larger one had more NAND chips (four vs. two in that specific case). For PC SSDs, the difference might be less dramatic, but it's often still there in the spec sheets. Many 1TB NVMe drives will boast slightly higher sequential write speeds or IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second – basically, how many small tasks it can juggle) than their 512GB counterparts. It’s not always a night-and-day difference for everyday use, but for heavy lifting? It can count.

• SLC Cache Size

  Most modern SSDs use a clever trick: a small portion of their storage acts as an ultra-fast cache (it writes data in a pseudo-SLC mode, which is speedier). Kind of like an express lane for incoming data. This cache is usually proportional to the drive's total capacity. So, a larger SSD often gets a larger SLC cache.

  Let’s take a classic example, the Samsung 970 EVO Plus. The 500GB model has around a 22GB SLC cache. The 1TB model? A beefier 42GB cache. What this means in practice is that the 1TB version can handle a much longer sustained burst of writing at its maximum speed before that cache fills up and speeds potentially drop. I’ve definitely experienced this myself when transferring massive video project files – a larger cache means the drive sustains its peak performance for longer before settling to its still-fast-but-not-peak native write speed. After the cache was full, that 1TB 970 EVO Plus also maintained a higher steady write speed (around 1700 MB/s) compared to the 500GB version (around 900 MB/s). So, if you're frequently moving huge files – like I do when archiving 4K footage from my camera to my PC – the 1TB version will likely finish the job quicker.

• Endurance

  This is one aspect I really value, especially for drives that see a lot of action: endurance, usually measured in Terabytes Written (TBW). It’s basically how much data the drive is rated to write over its lifespan before you might start seeing issues. Larger SSDs generally have higher TBW ratings. Why? More NAND flash cells to spread the wear across.

  Typically, if you double the capacity (assuming the same type of flash memory), you often double the TBW spec. Using that Samsung 970 EVO Plus again, the 500GB model is rated for 300 TBW, while the 1TB model doubles that to 600 TBW. As a content creator constantly writing large video files, project saves, and temporary render files, that higher endurance on a 1TB drive gives me a bit more peace of mind. For the average user, either drive will likely last for many, many years. But if your workflow is write-heavy like mine, or if you’re just someone who wants that extra layer of durability assurance, the 1TB's higher endurance is a nice bonus.

• Operating Near Full

  Here’s a big one from a user experience perspective: SSDs really don't like being almost full. Performance can take a noticeable nosedive if you push it much beyond 85-90% capacity. This happens because the controller has fewer free blocks to efficiently manage data, perform wear leveling (spreading writes evenly), and handle garbage collection (tidying up used space).

  It’s just easier to hit that "nearly full" state with a 512GB drive, especially if it's your only drive. With 1TB, you have a lot more breathing room before you start bumping up against that performance degradation ceiling. Keeping at least 10-20% of your SSD's space free is a widely recommended best practice for maintaining optimal performance and extending its lifespan. I once heard someone on the Linus Tech Tips forum say something like, “The best SSD is useless if too small – size it so that in a year you don’t go over 50% (usage)… They also get slower when full.” Now, keeping it under 50% might be very conservative for most, but the core point is valid: more free space helps your SSD stay zippy. From a psychological standpoint, constantly worrying about disk space is also just a drag on productivity.

• Thermals and Power

  This is usually a smaller consideration. A 1TB drive, having more chips, might consume a tiny bit more power under heavy load and potentially generate a fraction more heat compared to a 512GB version. However, modern SSD controllers are pretty smart about power management, and when the drive is idle, the difference is negligible – they sip power in milliwatts.

  High-performance NVMe drives, regardless of whether they're 512GB or 1TB, can get toasty under sustained, intense workloads. That’s why you see some come with heatsinks, or why good airflow in your PC case is always a good idea. If anything, the 1TB drive, with its potentially larger cache and ability to sustain heavy I/O for longer, might have a slightly greater potential to heat up during really long write sessions. In desktops, a simple M.2 heatsink or just ensuring your case fans are doing their job is usually enough. In laptops, the SSD is often positioned to benefit somewhat from the CPU/GPU cooling. Thermal throttling (where the drive slows itself down to prevent overheating) can happen to both 512GB and 1TB NVMe drives if they get too hot, but for normal day-to-day stuff like booting your OS, launching games, or opening applications, you're unlikely to hit this. It’s more of a concern for benchmarks or continuous, multi-hundred-gigabyte file transfers.

  Long story short: don't pick your SSD capacity based on thermals. Just be aware that any fast NVMe drive can warm up when pushed hard, and plan for reasonable airflow or a heatsink if you’re a power user.

TL;DR: The Performance Bottom Line

Yes, 1TB versions of SSDs tend to offer marginally better sustained performance and definitely higher write endurance than their 512GB counterparts. We might be talking about a 5-15% speed difference in specific, usually heavy-load scenarios, and double the TBW. For everyday tasks – Browse, Office apps, even light gaming – you’d probably be hard-pressed to feel a speed difference between a 512GB and a 1TB NVMe drive of the same model line. They're both incredibly fast, especially compared to older SATA drives (which hit a wall around 550-560 MB/s anyway, so capacity doesn't change their peak speed).

However, if you're someone who regularly pushes your storage with large file transfers, serious video editing, or other demanding workloads, that extra performance consistency and endurance from a 1TB drive can be a welcome bonus. But let’s be clear: the primary reason to opt for 1TB is still the sheer capacity. The potential performance bump is just a nice sweetener on top.

For those of you who like tables, here’s a quick comparison table of the two capacities across key considerations:

Factor	512GB SSD	1TB SSD
Typical Price (2025)	~$40–$150 (varies by model/brand). Lower for SATA or DRAM-less NVMe, higher for top-tier.	~$60–$300. Better $/GB value overall. Many quality 1TB drives <$80 in 2025.
How Many Large Games?	~3–5 AAA games (100GB+ each) before full. May require frequent uninstalling.	~6–10 AAA games or more. Extra headroom for new large titles (e.g. 4K texture packs).
Use Case Fit	Casual use, office/school work, light gaming, or secondary drive. Fine if most data is in cloud.	Gaming rigs, creative workstations, primary drive for most users. Ideal for media libraries, lots of apps/games.
Performance	Excellent for everyday tasks. Slightly lower peak speeds in some models (fewer NAND chips). Can slow down when nearly full.	Often slightly faster than 512GB in same model (more parallel flash channels). Maintains performance longer under load (bigger SLC cache).
Endurance (Longevity)	Very good, e.g. ~300 TBW (terabytes written) in many mid-range 500GB drives. Suitable for normal workloads.	Higher endurance – typically double the TBW of 512GB (e.g. 600 TBW for a 1TB SSD in the same family). Better for heavy write usage.
Pros	Lower cost; Enough for OS and moderate apps/games; uses less power at idle (fewer chips); available in compact laptops.	Higher capacity = store more locally; better $/GB; less need to micromanage space; improved sustained speed and lifespan; more future-proof.
Cons	Fills up quickly with large files; slightly worse $/GB; smaller SLC caches; may throttle sooner when nearly full.	Higher upfront cost; more NAND chips = slightly higher power draw under load (and potential heat); takes longer to securely erase or clone due to size.

Internal vs. External: Different SSDs for Different Gigs

Alright, another layer to this "which SSD is best" onion is figuring out whether you need an internal drive, an externalone, or, like many of us (myself included), a combination of both. These serve different roles, and your capacity needs might shift accordingly.

Internal SSDs

These are the drives that live inside your computer – your desktop PC, laptop, or even your game console. In 2025, if you're talking internal SSDs, you're mostly looking at the NVMe (Non-Volatile Memory Express) type, typically using an M.2 slot. These are those little "gumstick" shaped cards that plug directly into your motherboard. They use the PCIe (Peripheral Component Interconnect Express) interface, which is like a direct data superhighway to your CPU. This means blazing speeds. We're talking PCIe 3.0 drives pushing up to around 3.5 GB/s, PCIe 4.0 drives hitting up to roughly 7 GB/s, and the newer PCIe 5.0 drives aiming for 10 GB/s or even more under ideal conditions. When I built my current editing rig, a fast NVMe drive was non-negotiable for the OS and my active video projects; the responsiveness is just fantastic.

You'll also still find 2.5-inch SATA SSDs. These are the older design, shaped like a small, flat box, and they connect via a SATA cable. Their speed is capped by the SATA interface itself, topping out around 550-560 MB/s. Still way faster than an old spinning hard drive, but not in the same league as NVMe. These can be good for upgrading older PCs that don't have M.2 slots, or as more budget-friendly secondary storage where you don't need absolute peak speed. Both NVMe and SATA SSDs come in all the usual capacities – 512GB, 1TB, 2TB, and up.

• If You're Upgrading or Building a PC

  First thing to check is if your motherboard has a free M.2 NVMe slot. Most modern systems do. If yes, an NVMe drive is absolutely the way to go for maximum performance as your primary (boot) drive. Whether you choose 512GB or 1TB NVMe depends on all those usage scenarios we discussed earlier. If your system is older and only has SATA ports, or if you're looking for a cheaper secondary drive for games or media, a SATA SSD like the venerable Samsung 870 EVO (which comes in 500GB, 1TB, and larger) is a solid option.

• Capacity for Internal Drives

  The logic we've already covered applies. 1TB is generally the sweeter spot for a main internal drive if you can swing it. Some desktop PCs offer the flexibility of installing multiple drives. So, you could, for example, pair a super-fast 512GB NVMe SSD for your operating system and essential applications with a larger 1TB SATA SSD for your game library or bulk data. That can be a cost-effective approach. Just remember, in laptops, you often only get one internal drive slot, so you need to make that single choice count – go as big as your budget comfortably allows if it's your sole storage.

Advantages of internal drives? Max speed, baby. That direct connection means your OS, applications, and games run with the lowest possible latency and highest bandwidth. Loading massive game worlds or scrubbing through 4K video timelines on an internal NVMe drive feels almost instantaneous compared to older storage. A 1TB internal NVMe effectively supercharges your PC's capability. Plus, internal drives can often benefit from your system's overall cooling design and are easily monitored by system health tools (like S.M.A.R.T.). The only real "downside" is they're not portable – you can't just unplug your boot drive and stick it in your pocket (unless you put it in an external enclosure, but then it’s basically become a portable drive).

External SSDs (Portable Drives)

These are SSDs housed in their own enclosure, designed to connect to your devices typically via USB or Thunderbolt. Their whole purpose is portability and convenience: making backups, adding extra storage to laptops (especially those with soldered, non-upgradable internal drives – looking at you, newer Mac models!), expanding console storage, or just easily transferring big files between computers. This is where my psychology background chimes in – the user experience of having a fast, reliable external drive when you need to quickly offload files or take a project with you is just so much better than fiddling with slow USB sticks or bulky external HDDs.

Common external SSDs like the Samsung T7, SanDisk Extreme Portable, WD My Passport SSD, or Crucial X9 Pro generally use USB 3.x connections. Drives using USB 3.2 Gen 2 (that’s a mouthful, I know) often advertise speeds up to around 1050 MB/s – which is about 1 GB/s, a very respectable speed for an external drive, and pretty much what the Samsung T7 delivers. Some newer, higher-end external SSDs use even faster interfaces like USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 (which can hit around 2000 MB/s or 2 GB/s) or Thunderbolt 3/4 (which can also reach very high speeds), provided your computer also has a compatible port. The Kingston XS2000 is an example that can reach those 2 GB/s speeds over USB 3.2 Gen 2x2, and the SanDisk Extreme Pro v2 is in a similar league. These top-tier externals can rival the speed of older internal NVMe drives, though they're still not quite as fast as the latest internal PCIe 4.0 or 5.0 speedsters.

• Common Uses for External SSDs

  They are absolutely fantastic for backups. I rely on a couple of portable SSDs for regularly backing up my main workstation, including all my video projects and blog content. They're also a lifeline for expanding storage on devices where an internal upgrade is difficult, expensive, or impossible – think game consoles, or as mentioned, certain laptops.

  • A quick note on consoles: for the PlayStation 5, you can store PS5 games on an external USB SSD, but you have to move them back to the internal storage (or an internal M.2 expansion SSD) to actually play them. PS4 games, however, can be played directly from a compatible external USB SSD. The Xbox Series X/S have a similar rule: they'll only play older-gen games directly from a standard USB external drive; current-gen Xbox Series titles need to run from the internal SSD or the pricey proprietary expansion cards.

  • On a PC, you can actually install and run games from a sufficiently fast external SSD. Load times will likely be a bit longer than from an internal NVMe, but still significantly better than an external HDD. This can be a great workaround if, say, your laptop has a 512GB internal drive, and you get a 1TB external SSD to hold a larger game library or your massive photo/video archives. This is a setup I've used myself when traveling with my laptop.

• Choosing Capacity for External SSDs (512GB vs. 1TB)

  The same general logic applies, but the context is often that you're buying it in addition to your computer's internal storage.

  • If you’re using an external SSD primarily as a backup drive, my rule of thumb is to get one that's at least as large as the internal drive you're backing up, and preferably larger. For example, if I'm backing up my 1TB laptop, a 1TB external will do a full clone, but a 2TB external gives me room for multiple backup versions or to include other large files. Backing up a 512GB internal drive? A 512GB external gives you a 1:1 copy, but again, leaves little room for anything else. A 1TB external in that scenario offers much more flexibility for version history or additional storage.

  • If it's for extra active storage, 1TB again provides a lot more breathing room – it could hold around 200 full HD movies, or dozens of large 4K video projects. Because external SSDs often have a slight price premium per gigabyte (you're paying for the enclosure, interface electronics, and portability), some people opt for 512GB externals to save a bit of cash. However, in 2025, the price gap between a 500GB/512GB and a 1TB portable SSD is often small enough that the 1TB model still represents better value per gigabyte. For example, a Samsung T7 500GB might be around $70, while the 1TB version is closer to $110 – that extra $40 to double your space is often worth it.

  • For pure portability and specific tasks: Think about what you need to carry. As a content creator who sometimes shoots photos or video on location, I could easily fill up a 512GB portable drive from a single event if I’m capturing a lot of 4K video or hundreds of high-resolution RAW photos. In that scenario, a 1TB portable is a much safer bet for me. If you're a student who just needs to transfer some assignments, carry a portfolio, or have a small backup of essential files, 512GB should be perfectly adequate.

• Durability and Other Factors for Externals

  One of the big pluses of external SSDs is their durability. No moving parts means they handle bumps and jostles way better than old portable hard drives. Many, like the SanDisk Extreme series, even come with ruggedized, rubberized cases and sometimes IP ratings for water and dust resistance. They’re generally pocket-sized and super convenient. Capacity (512GB vs. 1TB) doesn't change the physical size or toughness.

  • One word of caution: because external drives connect via USB, always make sure to eject them properly from your operating system before unplugging them. Yanking the cable out mid-transfer or while it's being accessed can lead to data corruption. It's a simple step that saves a lot of potential headaches.

  • Also, and this taps into my preference for data privacy, if you're carrying sensitive information on an external drive, seriously consider models with hardware encryption. The Samsung T7 Touch, for example, even has a built-in fingerprint reader for an extra layer of security. Losing a 1TB drive full of personal or client data is exponentially worse than losing a 512GB one, simply because there's more at stake. Protecting that data is key.

Internal vs. External: The TL;DR

So, how do you choose? It’s not usually an either/or.

• Use an internal SSD (preferably NVMe) for your primary, high-speed storage needs: This is for your operating system, your most-used applications, and any active projects or games where speed is paramount.

• Augment that with an external SSD for backups, overflow storage, or easy file transfers between devices.

When it comes to capacity, apply the same core logic to both, but consider their roles. You might have a 1TB internal drive in your main PC and a 1TB (or larger) external SSD for comprehensive backups. Or, you could have a laptop with a 512GB internal SSD and use a 1TB external SSD to house your large media libraries or less frequently accessed games. There's no hard rule that your internal and external drives must be the same size – mix and match to fit your specific needs and budget. The key is to think about how you'll use each drive: if it’s your only drive in a laptop, prioritize getting a larger capacity if possible. If it's a secondary or external drive, you have a bit more flexibility based on its specific job.

Compatibility and Upgrade Considerations

Before we get to my favorite part – talking about some specific SSDs I actually like – there are a few quick but important practical things to consider. Think of this as the "Will it actually work with my stuff?" section.

A few quick notes here that might just nudge you one way or the other on capacity.

• Device Limitations

  This is a big one for me, especially since I value repairability and the ability to upgrade. Some super-thin-and-light laptops or tablets (I'm looking at certain Microsoft Surface devices, and many MacBooks, for example) have their storage soldered directly onto the motherboard. What that means is, whatever capacity you buy upfront is what you’re stuck with for the life of that device. No internal upgrades later. Period. In these cases, if the manufacturer offers a 1TB option and you even think you might need it down the line, seriously consider getting it from the get-go.

  Now, if you're buying a configurable laptop (say, from Dell, HP, or Apple), you’ll notice manufacturers often charge a hefty premium for those larger SSD upgrades. It's often called the "Apple tax," but plenty of companies do it. My take? If the premium feels outrageous, one strategy is to buy the base model (maybe with 512GB) and then heavily leverage external SSDs or cloud storage for everything else. As someone who balances features versus cost, this is often the route I'd explore.

  However, if you're building your own PC or have a system where you can easily swap drives (which is thankfully still common for many desktops and some laptops), you could totally start with a 512GB drive to save some cash now and then upgrade to a 1TB (or larger!) when prices drop even further or your needs grow. Cloning your old drive to a new, bigger one is a pretty common and relatively easy upgrade path these days, with plenty of good software to help.

• Older Hardware/OS

  Got an older computer you're looking to speed up with an SSD? Smart move. But make sure it can actually talk to the new drive.

  Any computer with a SATA port (which is most desktops and many laptops from the last 10-15 years) will happily accept a 2.5-inch SATA SSD, regardless of its capacity (512GB, 1TB, 2TB, they'll all work). I once put a 1TB SATA SSD into an old family laptop, and it was like giving it a new lease on life – boot times went from minutes to seconds.

  NVMe drives, those speedy little gumsticks, need a compatible M.2 slot on the motherboard and BIOS support. Most PCs made in the last, say, 5 to 6 years should have this, but it's always good to double-check your motherboard manual or specs.

  If you’re eyeing an SSD for a PlayStation 5, remember Sony has specific requirements: it needs to be a PCIe 4.0 NVMe drive, at least 250GB capacity, and meet certain minimum speed specs. Both 512GB and 1TB models of the popular recommended drives (like the Samsung 980 Pro/990 Pro or WD Black SN850X) will work just fine. Just steer clear of 256GB models for the PS5; while technically over the 250GB minimum, they often have slower write speeds, and Sony’s usable capacity might cut it too close. For older consoles like the PS4 or older Xbox One models, those use 2.5-inch SATA drives internally. Replacing a PS4’s ancient spinning hard drive with even a 512GB or 1TB SATA SSD can dramatically cut down on those infamous loading times.

• Drive Partitioning

  If you're someone who likes to dual-boot different operating systems (maybe Windows and a Linux distro for development work) or just meticulously separate your data, a larger drive gives you more flexibility. Trying to split a 512GB drive into two 256GB partitions for two different OSes can get pretty tight, pretty fast, once you account for the space each OS and its applications will consume. On the other hand, a 1TB drive gives you much more comfortable options – say, 200GB for a secondary OS and a roomy 800GB for your primary OS and files. As someone who occasionally experiments with different software that might run best in a specific environment, or for developers juggling virtual machines and large datasets, that extra space on a 1TB drive for partitioning is a real plus.

  Once you have your new drive, or if you're setting up an external one for the first time, you'll often need to format it to work with your system. If you need a walkthrough, I've put together a guide on how to format an SSD for both Windows & macOS.

• Lifespan and Warranty

  Most consumer SSDs these days come with a 3-year or, more commonly, a 5-year warranty, or they're rated for a certain amount of Terabytes Written (TBW) – whichever limit you hit first. As we touched on earlier, the TBW rating is generally higher on 1TB drives compared to their 512GB counterparts from the same family (often double). This means you're less likely to hit that TBW limit with a larger drive, especially if you have a write-heavy workload like video editing or frequent large file downloads.

  Practically speaking, for typical consumer use, either a 512GB or 1TB drive from a reputable brand should last well beyond that 5-year warranty period. SSDs don't just suddenly keel over the moment they hit their TBW rating; it's more of an endurance guideline. Of course, any component can fail (the controller chip, other electronics on the board), but modern SSDs are incredibly reliable.

  But here’s the most important takeaway, and something I can't stress enough: regardless of your SSD's size, capacity, or warranty, always keep backups of your important data. A larger capacity doesn't make a drive immune to unexpected failure, data corruption, or... well, user error. (Trust me, I've learned that lesson the hard way in the past).

My Favorite SSDs in 2025 (Internal & External) – 512GB and 1TB Options

Now that we’ve navigated pretty much every angle of the 512GB vs. 1TB decision, let's get to the fun part: some actual SSDs you might want to consider. These are some of my personal go-to recommendations, drives that I’ve either used, tested, or that consistently get top marks for performance and reliability. Whether you grab the 512GB or 1TB version, these drives are, in my book, well worth your money.

Samsung 990 Pro (Internal NVMe M.2, PCIe 4.0)

Feature	Specification
Type	Internal NVMe SSD
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x4, NVMe 2.0
Form Factor	M.2 2280
Capacities	1TB, 2TB, 4TB
Sequential Read	Up to 7,450 MB/s
Sequential Write	Up to 6,900 MB/s
Random Read (4KB, QD32)	Up to 1,400,000 IOPS (1TB, 2TB); Up to 1,600,000 IOPS (4TB)
Random Write (4KB, QD32)	Up to 1,550,000 IOPS
NAND Type	Samsung V-NAND TLC
DRAM Cache	Yes (1GB LPDDR4 for 1TB, 2GB for 2TB, 4GB for 4TB)
Endurance (TBW)	600 TBW (1TB), 1200 TBW (2TB), 2400 TBW (4TB)
Warranty	5-Year Limited
Special Features	Optional Heatsink model, Samsung Magician Software, AES 256-bit Full Disk Encryption, TCG/Opal V2.0

Why It’s Great

Look, if you want arguably the king of consumer PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSDs right now, this is pretty much it. Samsung claims speeds up to around 7,450 MB/s read and 6,900 MB/s write. It’s fast. The 1TB model, in particular, excels in random read/write performance, which is fantastic for snappy OS responsiveness, high-end gaming, or demanding workstation tasks like the video editing I do for my YouTube channel. Samsung drives have a long-standing reputation for reliability, and this one comes with a solid 5-year warranty (the 1TB model is rated for 600 TBW). If budget isn’t your primary concern and you just want top-tier performance for your boot drive or main work drive, the 990 Pro is a beast. (It’s worth noting the older Samsung 980 Pro is still a very good drive and might be found cheaper, but the 990 Pro addressed some earlier concerns and just pushes performance further).

Good For:

High-end gaming PCs, content creation workstations, anyone who wants peak PCIe 4.0 speed.

WD Black SN850X (Internal NVMe M.2, PCIe 4.0)

Feature	Specification
Type	Internal NVMe SSD
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x4, NVMe 1.4
Form Factor	M.2 2280
Capacities	1TB, 2TB, 4TB
Sequential Read	Up to 7,300 MB/s
Sequential Write	Up to 6,300 MB/s (1TB), Up to 6,600 MB/s (2TB, 4TB)
Random Read (4KB)	Up to 800K IOPS (1TB), Up to 1,200K IOPS (2TB, 4TB)
Random Write (4KB)	Up to 1,100K IOPS
NAND Type	BiCS5 112-layer TLC NAND
DRAM Cache	Yes (1GB DDR4 for 1TB, 2GB for 2TB/4TB)
Endurance (TBW)	600 TBW (1TB), 1200 TBW (2TB), 2400 TBW (4TB)
Warranty	5-Year Limited
Special Features	Optional Heatsink model (some with RGB), Game Mode 2.0 (Windows only), WD_BLACK Dashboard software

Why It’s Great

This is another top contender, especially popular among gamers, and for good reason. The SN850X delivers blistering speeds (up to 7,300 MB/s reads and 6,600 MB/s writes), putting it squarely in the same elite league as the Samsung 990 Pro. WD has also tuned it with features like "Game Mode 2.0" (on Windows) to optimize for gaming loads. The 1TB and 2TB versions even have an optional heatsink, some with a bit of RGB flair if that’s your style, which is handy for ensuring sustained performance in desktops (the heatsink, that is). Endurance is also strong (around 600 TBW for the 1TB, scaling up). If I were building a dedicated gaming rig today and wanted to load it up with my favorite titles, a 1TB SN850X would be very high on my list. The older SN850 (non-X) and the more mid-range SN770 are also good WD options if you find them at a significant discount, but the SN850X is their current champion.

Good For:

Serious gamers, performance enthusiasts, anyone needing fast load times and responsive storage.

SK hynix Platinum P41 (Internal NVMe M.2, PCIe 4.0)

Feature	Specification
Type	Internal NVMe SSD
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x4, NVMe
Form Factor	M.2 2280
Capacities	500GB, 1TB, 2TB
Sequential Read	Up to 7,000 MB/s
Sequential Write	Up to 4,700 MB/s (500GB), Up to 6,500 MB/s (1TB, 2TB)
Random Read (4KB)	Up to 960K IOPS (500GB), Up to 1,400K IOPS (1TB), Up to 1,350K IOPS (2TB)
Random Write (4KB)	Up to 1,000K IOPS (500GB), Up to 1,300K IOPS (1TB), Up to 1,250K IOPS (2TB)
NAND Type	SK hynix 176-layer TLC NAND
DRAM Cache	Yes (LPDDR4 - 512MB for 500GB, 1GB for 1TB, 2GB for 2TB)
Endurance (TBW)	500 TBW (500GB), 750 TBW (1TB), 1200 TBW (2TB)
Warranty	5-Year Limited
Special Features	High efficiency, Macrorify (SK hynix cloning/management software)

Why It’s Great

This drive often flies a bit under the radar compared to the Samsung and WD flagships, but make no mistake, the Platinum P41 is an absolutely phenomenal high-end SSD. SK hynix is one of the actual manufacturers of NAND flash memory and controllers, so they know their stuff. The 1TB model boasts speeds up to 7,000 MB/s read and 6,500 MB/s write, and it often scores incredibly well in random IOPS, making it feel extremely responsive. It’s a no-frills drive in terms of marketing, but it’s all about solid engineering and performance. Their previous Gen3 drive, the Gold P31, was legendary for its power efficiency, and the P41 continues to be quite efficient while maxing out Gen4 speeds. For an all-around fast, cool-running, and reliable 1TB NVMe, it's a fantastic pick.

Good For:

Discerning users wanting top-tier performance with excellent efficiency, great for laptops or desktops.

Crucial P3 Plus (Internal NVMe M.2, PCIe 4.0)

Feature	Specification
Type	Internal NVMe SSD
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x4, NVMe
Form Factor	M.2 2280
Capacities	500GB, 1TB, 2TB, 4TB
Sequential Read	Up to 4,700 MB/s (500GB), Up to 5,000 MB/s (1TB, 2TB, 4TB)
Sequential Write	Up to 1,900 MB/s (500GB), Up to 3,600 MB/s (1TB), Up to 4,200 MB/s (2TB), Up to 4,300 MB/s (4TB)
NAND Type	Micron 176-layer TLC NAND (though some QLC variants might exist for P3 non-Plus, P3 Plus is generally TLC)
DRAM Cache	No (DRAM-less, uses HMB - Host Memory Buffer)
Endurance (TBW)	110 TBW (500GB), 220 TBW (1TB), 440 TBW (2TB), 800 TBW (4TB)
Warranty	5-Year Limited
Special Features	Value-focused, Acronis True Image for Crucial (cloning software)

Why It’s Great

If you're on a tighter budget but still want the benefits of an NVMe PCIe 4.0 drive, the Crucial P3 Plus is a fantastic option. It’s a DRAM-less drive, which means it makes some compromises to hit its price point, but it still offers respectable Gen4 speeds (around 5000 MB/s sequential reads, though random I/O won't match the premium drives). Its real selling point is the price. As mentioned earlier, there were times where the 1TB model hit an astonishing $39 on sale. Even at more typical sale prices, it’s incredibly affordable. The 512GB version can be found for even less. Despite being a "budget" drive, it uses TLC NAND (which is good) and comes from Micron/Crucial, a very reputable name in memory and storage. Perfect for a secondary games drive, or for upgrading an older system to NVMe speeds without breaking the bank. You might not choose it for super heavy, constant write workloads due to the DRAM-less design, but for general use and game loading? It’s an absolute steal.

Another one in this budget NVMe space is the Solidigm P41 Plus. It often uses QLC NAND and can be found for ridiculously low prices (sometimes even under $30 for 1TB during deep sales!). Solidigm is a spinoff from Intel's former SSD division. For read-heavy tasks like a game library, it's fine, but for mixed or write-intensive use, the TLC-based Crucial P3 Plus generally offers better endurance and sustained performance.

Good For:

Budget builds, secondary storage, cost-effective upgrades from SATA or older HDDs.

Samsung 870 EVO (Internal 2.5” SATA)

Feature	Specification
Type	Internal SATA SSD
Interface	SATA III (6 Gbps)
Form Factor	2.5 inch
Capacities	250GB, 500GB, 1TB, 2TB, 4TB
Sequential Read	Up to 560 MB/s
Sequential Write	Up to 530 MB/s
Random Read (4KB, QD32)	Up to 98,000 IOPS
Random Write (4KB, QD32)	Up to 88,000 IOPS
NAND Type	Samsung V-NAND TLC
DRAM Cache	Yes (512MB LPDDR4 for 250/500GB, 1GB for 1TB, 2GB for 2TB, 4GB for 4TB)
Endurance (TBW)	150 TBW (250GB), 300 TBW (500GB), 600 TBW (1TB), 1200 TBW (2TB), 2400 TBW (4TB)
Warranty	5-Year Limited
Special Features	Samsung Magician Software, Intelligent TurboWrite (SLC Cache)

Why It’s Great

If your computer doesn't have an M.2 slot, or if you're looking for a rock-solid SATA drive for an older laptop or as bulk storage in a desktop, the Samsung 870 EVO is still pretty much the gold standard for SATA SSDs. It will max out the SATA III interface (around 560 MB/s reads/writes), has excellent random performance for a SATA drive, and comes in a huge range of capacities from 250GB all the way up to 4TB. The 1TB model is a fantastic choice to significantly speed up an aging laptop that’s still chugging along with a mechanical hard drive. It also boasts very high endurance ratings (the 1TB is around 600 TBW, scaling up significantly for larger capacities). You're unlikely to wear this drive out in normal use. It's usually a bit pricier than some other SATA SSDs, but the 5-year warranty and Samsung's excellent Magician software for drive management often make it worth the slight premium for critical systems. If you're looking for a slightly cheaper SATA alternative, the Crucial MX500 has been a classic choice for years, though it's an older model now and might be harder to find new in 2025.

Good For:

Upgrading older PCs/laptops without M.2 slots, reliable bulk storage in desktops.

External – Samsung T7 / T7 Shield Portable SSD

Feature	Specification (T7 / T7 Shield)
Type	External Portable SSD
Interface	USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10Gbps)
Form Factor	Portable (Palm-sized)
Capacities	500GB, 1TB, 2TB (T9 model goes up to 4TB)
Sequential Read	Up to 1,050 MB/s
Sequential Write	Up to 1,000 MB/s
Encryption	AES 256-bit hardware encryption
Security (T7 Touch)	Fingerprint sensor option
Durability (T7 Shield)	IP65 Water & Dust Resistance, Drop resistant up to 3 meters
Durability (T7 Standard)	Shock resistant up to 2 meters
Warranty	3-Year Limited
Software	Samsung Portable SSD Software 1.0, Samsung Magician Software (for internal monitoring of the underlying drive tech)

Why It’s Great

Samsung's T-series portable SSDs (like the T5 before it, and now the T7 and T9) are incredibly popular, and for very good reasons. They're compact, surprisingly fast for their size, and have a reputation for reliability. The T7 and the more rugged T7 Shield (which has a rubberized casing for better drop protection) use a USB 3.2 Gen 2 interface to deliver real-world transfer speeds around 1,050 MB/s – that’s about 1 GB per second. They come in 500GB, 1TB, and 2TB (and now the T9 goes up to 4TB). The T7 Touch variant, which I have and really appreciate, includes a fingerprint sensor for hardware encryption, adding a great layer of security for sensitive files. For most people needing a general-purpose external SSD, the T7 family really hits that sweet spot of performance, features, and price. The 1TB model can often be found on sale for around $90-$110. I use mine for everything from quick photo backups on the go, to expanding my laptop storage when traveling, or even as a temporary working drive for smaller video edits.

If you need even faster external speeds and your computer supports it, you could look at drives like the SanDisk Extreme Pro v2 or WD Black P50 Game Drive, which use USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 to potentially double the speed to around 2 GB/s. Or, if you have Thunderbolt 3 or 4 ports, dedicated Thunderbolt SSDs (or enclosures where you put your own NVMe drive inside) can push speeds even higher, closer to 2.5-3 GB/s. But for broad compatibility and excellent all-around performance, the USB-based T7 is a very safe and solid bet.

Good For:

Backups, portable storage for laptops/consoles, quick file transfers, secure portable data.

External – SanDisk Extreme Portable SSD

Feature	Specification
Type	External Portable SSD
Interface	USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10Gbps)
Form Factor	Portable
Capacities	500GB, 1TB, 2TB, 4TB
Sequential Read	Up to 1,050 MB/s
Sequential Write	Up to 1,000 MB/s
Durability	IP65 Water & Dust Resistance, Drop protection up to 2 or 3 meters (varies slightly by specific model/generation)
Security	Password protection featuring 256-bit AES hardware encryption
Warranty	5-Year Limited (typically, confirm for specific model)
Special Features	Carabiner loop for portability, Durable silicon shell

Why It’s Great

If you're looking for a portable SSD that’s built to take a bit of a beating while still delivering solid speed, the SanDisk Extreme Portable SSD (the non-Pro version) is a name that constantly comes up, and for good reason. Performance-wise, you're looking at speeds that are right up there with other popular USB 3.2 Gen 2 drives, typically around the 1000 MB/s mark for sequential transfers. So, it's plenty quick for moving large files, working on projects directly from the drive, or backing things up in a hurry.

But where this drive really carves out its niche is its durability. It boasts an IP65 rating for water and dust resistance. What does that mean in the real world? Well, if you’re a photographer like me who sometimes heads outdoors for shoots, or a student who’s constantly tossing their drive into a backpack, that IP65 rating gives you some valuable peace of mind. It means the drive can handle a bit of rain, a dusty environment, or the occasional splash without you having a meltdown about your precious data. As someone who values gear that lasts, this is a big plus for me. I've had my share of "oops" moments with tech over the years, and anything that adds a layer of protection is a winner in my book.

The SanDisk Extreme Portable SSD is available in the usual capacities – 500GB, 1TB, and even larger – and I’ve often seen the 1TB version hover around the $100 mark or less, especially during sales, which keeps it competitive in terms of value.

Now, for the sake of transparency, it’s worth noting that there was some online discussion a while back concerning firmware on some SanDisk (and their parent company, WD) portable SSDs. My understanding is that these issues were addressed by the company. It's always wise to ensure your drive's firmware is up to date, regardless of the brand, but generally, the SanDisk Extreme line has a strong reputation for reliability in demanding situations. You’ll find a lot of creative pros and outdoor enthusiasts who swear by these drives.

So, while other drives like the Samsung T7 are fantastic all-rounders, the SanDisk Extreme Portable really shines if your priority list includes ruggedness alongside speed and a fair price.

Good For:

Content creators working on location, students, travelers, or anyone needing cost-effective portable storage that offers an extra layer of protection against the elements and everyday bumps. If you're often outdoors or just a bit clumsy, this is a top pick.

Honorable Mention: WD My Passport Ultra

Feature	Specification
Type	External Portable HDD (Hard Disk Drive)
Interface	USB 3.0 (USB 2.0 compatible)
Form Factor	Portable
Capacities Available	1TB, 2TB, 4TB, 5TB (sometimes 6TB depending on model/region)
Read/Write Speed	Up to ~120-140 MB/s (typical for 5400 RPM portable HDDs, varies by capacity & specific benchmark)
Software	WD Backup™, WD Security™, WD Drive Utilities™
Encryption	256-bit AES hardware encryption option
Warranty	3-Year Limited
Special Features	Metal cover (Ultra model), Various color options

(Note: HDDs don't have TBW ratings like SSDs. Their longevity is more about mechanical reliability and is usually covered by the warranty period.)

Even though the WD My Passport Ultra is not an SSD but an HDD, I would still recommend it if you are looking for an external hard drive and all you need is as much storage as possible for as cheap as possible.

Check out my comprehensive review to learn more about the WD My Passport Ultra and why I prefer it over the standard WD My Passport.

TL;DR: My Personal Preferences

For an internal boot drive in a modern PC, I’d absolutely go for a 1TB NVMe SSD. My top picks would be something high-performance like the WD Black SN850X or Samsung 990 Pro, or the SK hynix Platinum P41 if I can find a good deal on it. The sheer responsiveness for the OS, applications, and my video editing workflow is worth it to me.

For external storage, a 1TB portable SSD like the Samsung T7 (especially the Touch version for security) or a SanDisk Extreme is incredibly versatile and something I use constantly for backups and transferring files.

If I were on a tighter budget, especially for a secondary PC or upgrading an older system, I’d probably look at a 512GB Crucial P3 Plus NVMe for the operating system and programs, and then pair it with a larger, cheaper 1TB SATA SSD (if the system supports multiple internal drives) or a 1TB external portable SSD for bulk storage of games, media, and archives. This way, you still get that snappy OS performance without breaking the bank on the primary drive, while ensuring you have ample space for everything else.

Everyone's exact needs and budget will differ, of course. But the drives I’ve listed here have consistently proven their worth in terms of performance, reliability, and value across countless reviews and user experiences, including my own observations and usage where applicable.

Final Verdict: So, 512GB or 1TB – What’s the Final Call for You in 2025?

Okay, we’ve been through a lot. So, how do you actually decide? It really comes down to asking yourself a few honest questions:

1. How much stuff do I actually need to keep on my computer locally?

   Take a look at your current storage. Are you constantly bumping up against the limit? If so, and you anticipate your game library, video projects, or photo collection growing, then leaning towards 1TB is a smart move. If your usage is pretty light and you’re good about using cloud storage or external drives for big archives, 512GB will likely serve you just fine.

2. What’s my budget really like for this?

   If every dollar, euro, or pound counts, and you need to allocate funds to other critical components (like a better graphics card for gaming, or more RAM for multitasking), then opting for a 512GB SSD now is perfectly reasonable. You can almost always add more storage later, especially with external drives. But, and this is a big "but" for 2025, with 1TB SSD prices being so competitive, that extra $20 to $40 (or equivalent) to double your capacity is often one of the most cost-effective upgrades you can make for long-term satisfaction.

3. Am I okay with playing storage manager, or do I just want tons of headroom?

   Some people (and I sometimes fall into this camp when I'm being disciplined) are perfectly fine with keeping a lean file system, regularly uninstalling unused games, and offloading older files to external drives or the cloud. Others (also me, on lazier days) prefer the "set it and forget it" approach of having so much free space they rarely have to think about it. If you’re in the latter group, 1TB will just feel more comfortable and carefree, especially as software and files inevitably get larger over the next few years.

4. What’s the primary job of this SSD?

   • Boot drive for your OS and main apps? 512GB can work if you're diligent about keeping large media files elsewhere.

   • All-in-one drive in a laptop that holds everything? This is where I’d strongly recommend 1TB if your budget allows. The convenience is worth it.

   • Dedicated scratch disk for video editing or other content creation? 1TB, minimum. No question. The temporary files alone can be huge.

   • Secondary drive just for your game library? 1TB is great if you have a lot of modern AAA titles. 512GB could work if you stick to a more curated selection or mostly play smaller indie games.

My Overall Take for 2025?

Considering how software, games, and high-resolution content are constantly growing, 1TB SSDs have really hit the mainstream sweet spot for primary storage. They just offer more flexibility, better long-term value, and a bit more breathing room. That slight bump in performance and endurance on many 1TB models is a nice little cherry on top.

A 512GB SSD is still a massive improvement over any old spinning hard drive, or those tiny 128GB/256GB SSDs that were common a few years ago. It absolutely still has its place, especially in budget-focused builds, for lighter users, or in secondary roles. If that’s what fits your needs and budget, go for it – you’ll still get a fast, responsive system.

But if you're on the fence, and that extra $20-$40 isn't going to break the bank, I’d gently nudge most people towards the 1TB option for all the reasons we've dived into. You're less likely to regret having too much space than too little.

Ultimately, there’s no single "wrong" choice between a 512GB and a 1TB SSD. It’s all about matching your storage to your specific needs, workflow, and budget. Hopefully, this deep dive has given you a much clearer picture of what those are for you.

Whichever capacity you land on, and whichever drive you pick (maybe one from my list!), you're going to enjoy the speed and reliability that modern SSDs bring to the table.

But the conversation doesn’t have to end here. I’m really interested to hear your take. Are you firmly in the 512GB camp, have you made the leap to 1TB (or are you already rocking even more space?), and what’s your go-to SSD model right now? Did any of my recommendations surprise you, or is there a hidden gem I missed? Drop your thoughts, your current setup, experiences, and any questions you still have in the comments section below. I genuinely enjoy reading through them and will do my best to respond!

And if you found this deep dive helpful and want to get more practical tech insights, straightforward reviews where I put gear through its real-world paces (you know, based on my actual use as a student and content creator), and my honest opinions on what’s actually worth your hard-earned money – all without the usual marketing hype – then you’ll definitely want to subscribe to my tech newsletter. It’s where I share even more tips, exclusive content, and my candid thoughts on the tech that shapes our daily lives, delivered straight from my desk here to your inbox.

Thanks so much for reading, and I'll catch you in the next one!

---

---

FAQ

• 1. So, Tobias, bottom line: is 1TB always the better choice than 512GB in 2025?

  Ha, if only it were that simple! Look, it's not always the objectively better choice for everyone, but for a lot of folks in 2025, it is the smarter buy. That relatively small price jump to double your storage, often get a slight performance and endurance bump, and just have way more breathing room? That makes 1TB incredibly compelling for long-term satisfaction.

  But if your budget is really tight and your computing needs are genuinely modest – we're talking light office work, web Browse, and you're not hoarding massive files – then a 512GB SSD is still a fantastic, speedy performer. It really boils down to matching the drive to your actual day-to-day usage, not just chasing the biggest number.

• 2. I’m a student like you, and I also dabble in some photo and video editing for fun – nothing professional yet. Can I get away with 512GB, or should I really try to stretch for that 1TB?

  This is where it gets super personal, right? If "dabbling" means you're editing a few photos a month and maybe a short video every now and then, and you're disciplined about moving finished projects to an external drive or the cloud, then yes, you can make 512GB work.

  However, speaking as someone who started my own YouTube piano channel as a hobby that grew, I can tell you firsthand: those RAW photo files, video clips, project files, and software cache folders start to pile up shockingly fast. If you can find a way to stretch your budget for the 1TB, your future self will likely send you a thank-you note. It just smooths out your workflow so much by reducing the constant need to manage storage. From a user experience standpoint, minimizing that friction is a huge win.

• 3. Realistically, how long do you think a 512GB or 1TB SSD will last me before I need to upgrade purely because of space?

  Ah, the crystal ball question! It honestly depends so much on how your usage habits change over time. Software, and especially games, aren't getting any smaller. If you buy a 512GB drive today and you're a heavy gamer, or you start shooting a lot of 4K video for your blog or YouTube channel, you could feel that space crunch within 2-3 years. A 1TB drive naturally buys you more time, potentially lasting 4-5 years or even longer before capacity becomes a pressing issue.

  My best advice is to look at how much data you're accumulating now and project that forward. My own video project archives have definitely ballooned much faster than I initially anticipated years ago!

• 4. You talked about NVMe and SATA drives. Is the type of SSD more critical than just going from 512GB to 1TB?

  They're both important, but they address different aspects. NVMe is all about raw speed and responsiveness – it’s that direct lane to your processor. SATA is the older, slower interface (though, let me be clear, still miles faster than an old spinning hard drive). Capacity, on the other hand, is purely about how much stuff you can store.

  Ideally, you want the fastest type of drive your system supports (usually NVMe for modern setups) with enough capacity for your needs. If I were forced to choose between, say, a 512GB NVMe SSD and a 1TB SATA SSD for my main operating system and applications drive, I'd personally lean towards the 512GB NVMe. That snappier everyday experience is something I really value. I'd then use cloud storage or an external SSD for bulk files. However, if this drive was going to be a secondary drive just for storing a massive game library where sheer space is the priority, then a 1TB SATA drive might be a better pick than a 512GB NVMe if a 1TB NVMe is out of budget. Context is king here.

• 5. How difficult is it really to upgrade an SSD later on, say from 512GB to 1TB?

  For most desktop PCs and a good number of laptops, it’s actually less daunting than you might think! I’ve done it a few times myself. The process generally involves opening up your computer (which, I get it, can feel like an operation, but there are tons of excellent step-by-step guides on sites like iFixit or YouTube for specific models), physically swapping the old drive for the new one, and then either reinstalling your operating system from scratch or – the more common and convenient route – using cloning software to make an exact copy of your old drive onto the new one. The most crucial first step, though, is to confirm that your device actually allows for SSD upgrades.

  As I mentioned in the main post, many ultra-thin laptops and some all-in-one PCs have their storage soldered directly to the motherboard, making internal upgrades impossible. Always verify that before you buy a new internal drive!

• 6. With cloud storage being so good these days (like Google Drive, iCloud, OneDrive), do I really need a massive internal SSD like 1TB anymore?

  That’s a perfectly valid question! And yes, cloud storage is an amazing tool – I rely on it heavily for backups, for accessing my documents across devices, and for sharing files. However, it doesn't replace the need for sufficient, fast localstorage. Your operating system, all your installed applications, your games, and especially the large media files you’re actively working on (like video editing projects or complex graphic designs) all benefit immensely from the near-instant access speeds of a local SSD.

  Imagine trying to edit a 4K video project where all your raw footage is constantly being streamed from the cloud – the lag would be painful, not to mention the potential impact on your internet data cap! I like to think of my internal SSD as my high-speed workshop for all my current tasks, while cloud storage is more like my vast, accessible off-site warehouse. You ideally need both, and your workshop needs to be spacious and quick enough to handle what you’re doing right now.

• 7. You mentioned SSDs can slow down when they get too full. Does constantly keeping an SSD near, say, 90% capacity also shorten its lifespan significantly?

  The primary and most noticeable effect of running an SSD very full is performance degradation, not drastically reduced lifespan for most users. SSDs need some empty space to efficiently perform background tasks like wear leveling (distributing writes evenly across all memory cells) and garbage collection (tidying up blocks of data that are no longer in use). When it’s packed to the brim, these processes struggle, and the drive can feel noticeably sluggish.

  While, theoretically, operating an SSD constantly near full could slightly increase something called "write amplification" (meaning the drive has to do more background writes for every user write), the impact on its overall rated endurance (TBW) is generally minor compared to the immediate and frustrating performance hit you'll experience. My standing advice, and what most manufacturers recommend, is to try and keep at least 10-20% of your SSD capacity free.

---

---

MOST POPULAR

LATEST ARTICLES

---